Análisis de la cobertura de prensa de EU al proceso electoral

By Daniel Politi, Today’s Papers, Slate Magazine

USA Today leads with an analysis that shows “independent political groups” have spent $17.3 million in the first three months of the year, which is more than double what was spent during the same period in the 2004 presidential contest. The vast majority of that money has helped Democrats (around 80 percent), although, of course, that’s seen as a result of the drawn out battle between Sens. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. “We can expect to see much more money,” a campaign finance expert said.

The top beneficiary of the spending by independent groups has been Obama. Between Jan. 1 and March 31, $7.4 million was used to help the Illinois senator, most of which came from a labor union. Comparatively, independent groups have spent $5.4 million to aid Clinton’s candidacy.

In related news, the WP off-leads a look at how, despite Obama’s claim that he has created a “parallel public financing system,” he still relies on rich bundlers for much of his money. The paper doesn’t deny that Obama has raised lots of money from small-time, individual donors and points out that about half of his money has come from donations of $200 or less. But for the other half of the whopping $240 million he has raised, Obama has, just like the other contenders, relied on rich, well-connected people. Seventy-nine bundlers have helped raise at least $200,000 each, and much of it came from typical Democratic donors, such as Hollywood stars and trial lawyers. But Obama has also managed to get newcomers into the bundling game, including many who had never made a contribution to a presidential campaign.

In other news from the campaign trail, everyone points out that Sen. John McCain switched his position on how much the government should help homeowners who are having trouble keeping up with mortgage payments. He had been criticized for taking a largely hands-off approach and saying the government shouldn’t “reward those who act irresponsibly.” But yesterday he put forward a plan that “included a heavy dose of policy more typically associated with Democrats,” says the WSJ. The plan would aid homeowners who are having trouble making their payments, but McCain insisted that it won’t help speculators and investors.

The LAT notes inside that “a long-standing Philadelphia ritual” involves political candidates handing out “street money” to Democratic operatives in the city who then mostly give it out as a sort of payment to the “foot soldiers” working to get out the vote. It’s perfectly legal, but it seems Obama’s campaign is telling local leaders that it won’t pay up. Neither Clinton nor Obama is publicly talking about whether they’ll hand out the money. But some ward leaders say that Obama’s campaign has made it clear it won’t pay up and are warning that this could hurt Obama’s chances in the April 22 primary. “It’s our tradition,” a ward leader said. “You don’t come to someone’s house and change the rules of someone’s house. That’s just respect.”

Un comentario el “Análisis de la cobertura de prensa de EU al proceso electoral

  1. CINTLI LUNA dice:

    Hay que mencionar que los procesos electorales entre nuestro país, México y Estados Unidos son muy diferentes. Por lo tanto hay cuestiones que no me quedan del todo claras en cuanto al financiamiento de las camapañas o pre campañas, que en este momento se disputan para elejir candidato hacia la presidencia de la Unión americana.
    Pero si creo que se esta gastando mucho dinero en esta pre campaña entre Hilary y Obama, que si bien viene de colaboradores o simpatizantes, en el artículo anterior se menciona que hay organizaciones, sindicatos, que dan su apoyo. Creo que en este caso deberían frenar o poner un límite respecto aportaciones y de quienes. Supongo que si debe de existir, como aquí en nustro país, el COFIPE;
    sin embargo lo desconosco. Es demasiado dinero el que se esta utilizando para elegir al candidato a la presidencia por parte del partido Democrata y que a la larga creo que perjudicaría a este partido cuando se realize la campaña ya como tal con el candidato ganador, Obama o Hilary.

Responder

Introduce tus datos o haz clic en un icono para iniciar sesión:

Logo de WordPress.com

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de WordPress.com. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Imagen de Twitter

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Twitter. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Foto de Facebook

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Facebook. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Google+ photo

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Google+. Cerrar sesión / Cambiar )

Conectando a %s